<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 795 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98410</link>
    <description>Transaction value under customs valuation cannot be rejected unless the authority establishes valid grounds on objective, comparable material. A higher price from another import is insufficient where the comparison lacks particulars on quantity, commercial level, country of origin and grade, and where the importer&#039;s invoice and supporting documents are not properly addressed. In the absence of technical literature, test reports or reliable market data showing that the goods were of a standard variety warranting enhancement, rejection of the declared value is unsustainable. The enhanced assessable value was therefore not maintainable and the declared transaction value stood accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 795 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98410</link>
      <description>Transaction value under customs valuation cannot be rejected unless the authority establishes valid grounds on objective, comparable material. A higher price from another import is insufficient where the comparison lacks particulars on quantity, commercial level, country of origin and grade, and where the importer&#039;s invoice and supporting documents are not properly addressed. In the absence of technical literature, test reports or reliable market data showing that the goods were of a standard variety warranting enhancement, rejection of the declared value is unsustainable. The enhanced assessable value was therefore not maintainable and the declared transaction value stood accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>