https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98401 Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 excludes only the time properly required for obtaining a certified copy, not delay caused by a party's own failure to take necessary procedural steps. In winding-up matters, the Calcutta Original Side practice requiring a requisition for drawing up the order continued to operate under Rule 6, as it was not inconsistent with the Companies Act or the Companies (Court) Rules. On the facts, the appellant was not treated as being in default, the relevant time was excluded, and limitation did not bar the proposed appeal. en-us Tue, 04 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:44:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98401 Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 excludes only the time properly required for obtaining a certified copy, not delay caused by a party's own failure to take necessary procedural steps. In winding-up matters, the Calcutta Original Side practice requiring a requisition for drawing up the order continued to operate under Rule 6, as it was not inconsistent with the Companies Act or the Companies (Court) Rules. On the facts, the appellant was not treated as being in default, the relevant time was excluded, and limitation did not bar the proposed appeal. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 04 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98401