https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98392 The court dismissed the application for the removal of the 2nd respondent as voluntary liquidator, finding no justifiable reasons to consider him unfit for the position. Emphasizing the importance of the members' decision in a voluntary liquidation, the court noted the lack of compelling evidence to override their choice. Both Company Application No. 120 of 1967 and Company Application No. 121 of 1967 were dismissed without any order as to costs. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:36:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98392 The court dismissed the application for the removal of the 2nd respondent as voluntary liquidator, finding no justifiable reasons to consider him unfit for the position. Emphasizing the importance of the members' decision in a voluntary liquidation, the court noted the lack of compelling evidence to override their choice. Both Company Application No. 120 of 1967 and Company Application No. 121 of 1967 were dismissed without any order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98392