<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 661 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate appeals related to the recovery of duty drawbacks, as excluded by Section 129A of the Customs Act. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed. Member (J) G.N. Srinivasan concurred, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s adherence to statutory boundaries despite practical difficulties faced by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:06:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 661 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate appeals related to the recovery of duty drawbacks, as excluded by Section 129A of the Customs Act. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed. Member (J) G.N. Srinivasan concurred, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s adherence to statutory boundaries despite practical difficulties faced by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>