https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98360 The court dismissed the summons, ruling that the applicants were not employees but agents of the company based on the agreement dated 10th April, 1961. The judgment emphasized the principal-agent relationship, highlighting that the agreement designated the applicants as selling agents with the company retaining control over certain aspects of the sales process. The court concluded that the applicants were not entitled to arrears of wages under the scheme as claimed, upholding the principal-agent relationship established by the agreement's terms and conditions. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:42:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98360 The court dismissed the summons, ruling that the applicants were not employees but agents of the company based on the agreement dated 10th April, 1961. The judgment emphasized the principal-agent relationship, highlighting that the agreement designated the applicants as selling agents with the company retaining control over certain aspects of the sales process. The court concluded that the applicants were not entitled to arrears of wages under the scheme as claimed, upholding the principal-agent relationship established by the agreement's terms and conditions. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 26 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98360