<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 697 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98358</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on the excisability of polyester sewing thread and remanded the matter to the Assistant Commissioner. The Assistant Commissioner was directed to determine if the product is manufactured and excisable under the Tariff, as well as decide on the availability of the benefit under Notification No. 35/95. The appeal was allowed for further examination and decision-making.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 697 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98358</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on the excisability of polyester sewing thread and remanded the matter to the Assistant Commissioner. The Assistant Commissioner was directed to determine if the product is manufactured and excisable under the Tariff, as well as decide on the availability of the benefit under Notification No. 35/95. The appeal was allowed for further examination and decision-making.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>