<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 696 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE &amp; CUSTOMS (APPEALS)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98357</link>
    <description>The court rejected the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming that the cost of optional literature in trading activities should not be included in the assessable value. The decision emphasized the significance of specific agreements and the optional nature of expenses in determining their inclusion in the assessable value, aligning with previous court and tribunal judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 696 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE &amp; CUSTOMS (APPEALS)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98357</link>
      <description>The court rejected the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming that the cost of optional literature in trading activities should not be included in the assessable value. The decision emphasized the significance of specific agreements and the optional nature of expenses in determining their inclusion in the assessable value, aligning with previous court and tribunal judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>