<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 695 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98356</link>
    <description>The judge set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision to confiscate goods under the Customs Act, 1962, ruling in favor of the appellant. The goods, Konica Adhesive Tapes, were deemed not to be consumer packs as they were intended for internal use by the importer and required further processing before being market-ready. The judge emphasized the significance of packaging and the intended use of goods in determining their classification under import regulations, ultimately allowing both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 695 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98356</link>
      <description>The judge set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision to confiscate goods under the Customs Act, 1962, ruling in favor of the appellant. The goods, Konica Adhesive Tapes, were deemed not to be consumer packs as they were intended for internal use by the importer and required further processing before being market-ready. The judge emphasized the significance of packaging and the intended use of goods in determining their classification under import regulations, ultimately allowing both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>