<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (9) TMI 69 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98355</link>
    <description>Delay in bringing the legal representatives of a deceased defendant on record may be excused where sufficient cause is shown, and such a discretionary finding is not ordinarily interfered with in revision absent jurisdictional error. The note also states that a suit for recovery of money based on statutory civil liability under section 86D of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 can survive against the deceased defendant&#039;s estate: section 235, which provides a special winding-up procedure for misfeasance and contribution, does not exclude the general remedy by suit unless the statute clearly limits it. The suit therefore does not abate merely because the defendant dies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:37:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (9) TMI 69 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98355</link>
      <description>Delay in bringing the legal representatives of a deceased defendant on record may be excused where sufficient cause is shown, and such a discretionary finding is not ordinarily interfered with in revision absent jurisdictional error. The note also states that a suit for recovery of money based on statutory civil liability under section 86D of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 can survive against the deceased defendant&#039;s estate: section 235, which provides a special winding-up procedure for misfeasance and contribution, does not exclude the general remedy by suit unless the statute clearly limits it. The suit therefore does not abate merely because the defendant dies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>