<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (3) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98330</link>
    <description>Section 195 in winding up proceedings vests the examination power in the court, and the application need not be confined to the official liquidator where the liquidator does not act; a creditor&#039;s request can therefore be entertained in a fit case. Rule 197 regulates attendance at the examination but does not exhaustively prohibit the court from permitting a creditor, and where fairness requires, legal assistance may also be allowed. The examination is a limited discovery process and should be confined to identified matters connected with the company&#039;s assets and transactions, so as to prevent an unrestricted fishing inquiry while preserving procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:49:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (3) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98330</link>
      <description>Section 195 in winding up proceedings vests the examination power in the court, and the application need not be confined to the official liquidator where the liquidator does not act; a creditor&#039;s request can therefore be entertained in a fit case. Rule 197 regulates attendance at the examination but does not exhaustively prohibit the court from permitting a creditor, and where fairness requires, legal assistance may also be allowed. The examination is a limited discovery process and should be confined to identified matters connected with the company&#039;s assets and transactions, so as to prevent an unrestricted fishing inquiry while preserving procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>