<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (12) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98318</link>
    <description>The court held that the alleged agreement between the parties was void ab initio for not meeting the mandatory condition under section 294(2) of the Companies Act. Consequently, there was no valid sole selling agency or arbitration agreement. The petition was dismissed, and each party was to bear its own costs. The defendants were directed to maintain separate accounts for three weeks from the date of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (12) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98318</link>
      <description>The court held that the alleged agreement between the parties was void ab initio for not meeting the mandatory condition under section 294(2) of the Companies Act. Consequently, there was no valid sole selling agency or arbitration agreement. The petition was dismissed, and each party was to bear its own costs. The defendants were directed to maintain separate accounts for three weeks from the date of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>