<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98317</link>
    <description>The court confirmed the alteration to the memorandum of association under Section 17 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the company to include the manufacture of rubber products. The court determined that the new business could be conveniently combined with the existing business without detriment, as it aligned with the company&#039;s resources and market demand. With unanimous shareholder approval and no opposition from major creditors, the court found the alteration to be in the best interests of the company. Despite the absence of an industrial license, the court deemed the petition timely and granted approval for the alteration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98317</link>
      <description>The court confirmed the alteration to the memorandum of association under Section 17 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the company to include the manufacture of rubber products. The court determined that the new business could be conveniently combined with the existing business without detriment, as it aligned with the company&#039;s resources and market demand. With unanimous shareholder approval and no opposition from major creditors, the court found the alteration to be in the best interests of the company. Despite the absence of an industrial license, the court deemed the petition timely and granted approval for the alteration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>