https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98313 The court upheld the winding-up order, emphasizing the sufficiency of affidavit evidence and the allegations in the petition. The appellants' objections regarding the lack of oral evidence were deemed invalid, as affidavits were considered permissible and sufficient. The withdrawal of defense by the contesting respondents further supported the decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs awarded to the respondents. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:26:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98313 The court upheld the winding-up order, emphasizing the sufficiency of affidavit evidence and the allegations in the petition. The appellants' objections regarding the lack of oral evidence were deemed invalid, as affidavits were considered permissible and sufficient. The withdrawal of defense by the contesting respondents further supported the decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs awarded to the respondents. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 20 Jul 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98313