<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (2) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98305</link>
    <description>A pending misfeasance and recovery suit may continue in favour of a transferee bank where amalgamation occurs under a statutory scheme that transfers assets, liabilities, rights and interests and expressly provides for pending proceedings to continue. The general rule against assignment of a bare right to sue for tort does not apply where the transfer operates by law under an overriding amalgamation scheme. The commentary also notes that, absent any statutory provision terminating the suit or confining the claimant to a misfeasance application under company law, the original suit remains a proper and maintainable remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (2) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98305</link>
      <description>A pending misfeasance and recovery suit may continue in favour of a transferee bank where amalgamation occurs under a statutory scheme that transfers assets, liabilities, rights and interests and expressly provides for pending proceedings to continue. The general rule against assignment of a bare right to sue for tort does not apply where the transfer operates by law under an overriding amalgamation scheme. The commentary also notes that, absent any statutory provision terminating the suit or confining the claimant to a misfeasance application under company law, the original suit remains a proper and maintainable remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>