https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98285 Rectification of the register of members remained available notwithstanding an earlier remedy under section 111(3), because the jurisdiction under section 155 was treated as independent and the earlier proceeding did not bar statutory rectification. Where shares vested by operation of law, section 108(1) formalities for voluntary transfers did not apply, and the company could not insist on a stamped transfer instrument or import the lost-deed requirement into the proviso governing transmission by law. The refusal to register on that basis was unjustified, and the register was directed to be corrected in favour of the shareholder, with costs for the delay. en-us Sat, 16 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:43:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98285 Rectification of the register of members remained available notwithstanding an earlier remedy under section 111(3), because the jurisdiction under section 155 was treated as independent and the earlier proceeding did not bar statutory rectification. Where shares vested by operation of law, section 108(1) formalities for voluntary transfers did not apply, and the company could not insist on a stamped transfer instrument or import the lost-deed requirement into the proviso governing transmission by law. The refusal to register on that basis was unjustified, and the register was directed to be corrected in favour of the shareholder, with costs for the delay. Case-Laws Companies Law Sat, 16 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98285