<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 763 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98279</link>
    <description>A challenge was raised to an absolute confiscation order on the ground that no option to redeem the confiscated goods had been granted under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal treated the absence of a redemption option as sufficient, at the interim stage, to dispose of the stay applications. All stay petitions were allowed unconditionally, and the main appeals were directed to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 763 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98279</link>
      <description>A challenge was raised to an absolute confiscation order on the ground that no option to redeem the confiscated goods had been granted under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal treated the absence of a redemption option as sufficient, at the interim stage, to dispose of the stay applications. All stay petitions were allowed unconditionally, and the main appeals were directed to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>