<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (2) TMI 43 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98277</link>
    <description>The court allowed the official liquidator&#039;s application for the public examination of the managing director, C.V. Raman, due to fraudulent activities in the company&#039;s business. The application against other directors and the secretary was dismissed, citing lack of evidence implicating them in the fraud. The court authorized the official liquidator to conduct the examination within six months, with a three-week suspension period for potential appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (2) TMI 43 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98277</link>
      <description>The court allowed the official liquidator&#039;s application for the public examination of the managing director, C.V. Raman, due to fraudulent activities in the company&#039;s business. The application against other directors and the secretary was dismissed, citing lack of evidence implicating them in the fraud. The court authorized the official liquidator to conduct the examination within six months, with a three-week suspension period for potential appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>