<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 68 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98261</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition, ruling that writ jurisdiction could not be invoked in disciplinary proceedings between an employer and an employee. The court emphasized the Corporation&#039;s separate legal entity from its shareholders, rejecting the argument that government control transformed it into a public authority. The decision highlighted the limitations of challenging internal disciplinary actions of private entities through writ jurisdiction, emphasizing the distinction between public and private bodies in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:08:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 68 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98261</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition, ruling that writ jurisdiction could not be invoked in disciplinary proceedings between an employer and an employee. The court emphasized the Corporation&#039;s separate legal entity from its shareholders, rejecting the argument that government control transformed it into a public authority. The decision highlighted the limitations of challenging internal disciplinary actions of private entities through writ jurisdiction, emphasizing the distinction between public and private bodies in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>