<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 745 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98259</link>
    <description>The stay petitions were allowed as the confiscated goods and trucks were deemed not redeemable, leading to the approval of stay petitions for the transporting company and related individuals. For other applicants with no specific involvement, their stay petitions were unconditionally granted. The appeals were prioritized for an expedited hearing on July 19, 2000, due to the significant impact of the case on the parties involved and the necessity for a prompt resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:02:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 745 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98259</link>
      <description>The stay petitions were allowed as the confiscated goods and trucks were deemed not redeemable, leading to the approval of stay petitions for the transporting company and related individuals. For other applicants with no specific involvement, their stay petitions were unconditionally granted. The appeals were prioritized for an expedited hearing on July 19, 2000, due to the significant impact of the case on the parties involved and the necessity for a prompt resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>