https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98243 A company may carry on business and contract under a trade name different from its registered corporate name where it is disclosed as the proprietor, so the contract is not void merely for want of identity with the registered name; on that basis, the arbitration agreement and award were treated as valid. The award was also not liable to be set aside merely because the arbitrator accepted one version of the delivery evidence or because the petitioner considered the delivery orders and proof of delivery insufficient, as assessment of evidentiary weight remained within the arbitrator's province. The application was dismissed and the award upheld. en-us Wed, 01 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:35:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98243 A company may carry on business and contract under a trade name different from its registered corporate name where it is disclosed as the proprietor, so the contract is not void merely for want of identity with the registered name; on that basis, the arbitration agreement and award were treated as valid. The award was also not liable to be set aside merely because the arbitrator accepted one version of the delivery evidence or because the petitioner considered the delivery orders and proof of delivery insufficient, as assessment of evidentiary weight remained within the arbitrator's province. The application was dismissed and the award upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 01 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98243