<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (8) TMI 55 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98241</link>
    <description>The court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, ruling the forfeiture of shares invalid due to defects in the notice. It affirmed the respondents&#039; right to challenge the forfeiture and ordered rectification of the share register under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956. The judgment emphasized the necessity of complying with legal requirements in forfeiture notices and the court&#039;s discretionary power in granting relief under section 155.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (8) TMI 55 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98241</link>
      <description>The court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, ruling the forfeiture of shares invalid due to defects in the notice. It affirmed the respondents&#039; right to challenge the forfeiture and ordered rectification of the share register under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956. The judgment emphasized the necessity of complying with legal requirements in forfeiture notices and the court&#039;s discretionary power in granting relief under section 155.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>