<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 715 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98229</link>
    <description>Time spent in pursuing a request before the Government for separate relief could not be treated as bona fide prosecution of a remedy before the wrong forum for limitation purposes. Because the appeal was filed beyond the prescribed period and the appellants were not pursuing an appellate remedy in the wrong forum, the delay could not be excluded. The limitation objection was therefore upheld and the appeal remained time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:08:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 715 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98229</link>
      <description>Time spent in pursuing a request before the Government for separate relief could not be treated as bona fide prosecution of a remedy before the wrong forum for limitation purposes. Because the appeal was filed beyond the prescribed period and the appellants were not pursuing an appellate remedy in the wrong forum, the delay could not be excluded. The limitation objection was therefore upheld and the appeal remained time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>