<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (2) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98218</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the winding up petition against a private limited company, directing a notice to the company. The court clarified that the company does not have a statutory right to be heard before the admission of the petition. The court upheld the admission of the petition, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing for all parties involved in winding up petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:55:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (2) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98218</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the winding up petition against a private limited company, directing a notice to the company. The court clarified that the company does not have a statutory right to be heard before the admission of the petition. The court upheld the admission of the petition, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing for all parties involved in winding up petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>