<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 626 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98201</link>
    <description>CTD bars and rods packed in bundles bearing the TISCON label were treated as branded goods because a brand name may be indicated on the packing or bundles if it links the goods to the brand owner in trade. On that basis, such clearances were excluded from the aggregate value for SSI exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. The record was, however, insufficient to confirm that every clearance of CTD bars manufactured for TISCO carried the TISCON label, so invoice-wise verification and chronological reworking of duty were required. The matter was remanded for factual verification and fresh computation after adjustment of duty already paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 626 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98201</link>
      <description>CTD bars and rods packed in bundles bearing the TISCON label were treated as branded goods because a brand name may be indicated on the packing or bundles if it links the goods to the brand owner in trade. On that basis, such clearances were excluded from the aggregate value for SSI exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. The record was, however, insufficient to confirm that every clearance of CTD bars manufactured for TISCO carried the TISCON label, so invoice-wise verification and chronological reworking of duty were required. The matter was remanded for factual verification and fresh computation after adjustment of duty already paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>