<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (4) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98195</link>
    <description>The court held that the plaintiffs were not subscribers to the memorandum of association, were not validly appointed as directors, and did not comply with the share qualification requirements. The appeal was allowed, and the suit was dismissed with costs throughout.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:00:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (4) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98195</link>
      <description>The court held that the plaintiffs were not subscribers to the memorandum of association, were not validly appointed as directors, and did not comply with the share qualification requirements. The appeal was allowed, and the suit was dismissed with costs throughout.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>