<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (4) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98190</link>
    <description>The court concluded that retaining proceeds collected from past members was not justified as the company&#039;s assets were sufficient to cover debts. Therefore, the court ordered the refund of the collected amount to past members. It was decided not to enforce further contributions from past members or recover funds from preference shareholders. The costs of the application were to be covered by the estate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:53:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (4) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98190</link>
      <description>The court concluded that retaining proceeds collected from past members was not justified as the company&#039;s assets were sufficient to cover debts. Therefore, the court ordered the refund of the collected amount to past members. It was decided not to enforce further contributions from past members or recover funds from preference shareholders. The costs of the application were to be covered by the estate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>