https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98184 The court dismissed the petition for rectification of the share register under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956, due to the complexity of the title dispute. It held that the summary remedy was not suitable for resolving intricate questions of fact and law, advising the petitioner to pursue legal action in a civil court for resolution. The court emphasized the need for a comprehensive examination of disputed facts and highlighted the limitations of summary jurisdiction in such cases. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:40:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98184 The court dismissed the petition for rectification of the share register under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956, due to the complexity of the title dispute. It held that the summary remedy was not suitable for resolving intricate questions of fact and law, advising the petitioner to pursue legal action in a civil court for resolution. The court emphasized the need for a comprehensive examination of disputed facts and highlighted the limitations of summary jurisdiction in such cases. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 03 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98184