<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (1) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98181</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed, and the court upheld the decisions of the Division Bench of the High Court, finding no case of oppression under Section 397 or mismanagement under Section 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The resolutions passed on March 1, 1958, and March 29, 1958, were found to be valid, and the agreement dated July 27, 1954, was not binding on the public company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (1) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98181</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed, and the court upheld the decisions of the Division Bench of the High Court, finding no case of oppression under Section 397 or mismanagement under Section 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The resolutions passed on March 1, 1958, and March 29, 1958, were found to be valid, and the agreement dated July 27, 1954, was not binding on the public company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>