<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (9) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98169</link>
    <description>The court held that the petition under sections 397 and 398 was maintainable, emphasizing valid consent letters from shareholders. Allegations of fraud lacked particularization, and delays in seeking relief indicated acquiescence. The court found no urgency for interim relief, noting the availability of alternative remedies pursued by the petitioners. No relief was granted under sections 397 and 398 due to lack of grounds for winding up or material change in management. Interim orders were to continue, with costs to be part of the petition proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (9) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98169</link>
      <description>The court held that the petition under sections 397 and 398 was maintainable, emphasizing valid consent letters from shareholders. Allegations of fraud lacked particularization, and delays in seeking relief indicated acquiescence. The court found no urgency for interim relief, noting the availability of alternative remedies pursued by the petitioners. No relief was granted under sections 397 and 398 due to lack of grounds for winding up or material change in management. Interim orders were to continue, with costs to be part of the petition proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>