<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 36 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98156</link>
    <description>Rent due to the Government does not fall within the preferential debts protected by section 530 of the Companies Act, 1956, because that provision covers only revenues, taxes, cesses and rates within the statutory period; such rent ranks merely as an ordinary debt in winding up. Section 518 cannot be used to restrain recovery proceedings initiated by a District Collector under the Madras Revenue Recovery Act, because it is confined to attachments, distress or execution issued by a court, and an administrative recovery officer is not a court. The Government&#039;s recovery action therefore remained outside the Companies Act relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:40:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 36 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98156</link>
      <description>Rent due to the Government does not fall within the preferential debts protected by section 530 of the Companies Act, 1956, because that provision covers only revenues, taxes, cesses and rates within the statutory period; such rent ranks merely as an ordinary debt in winding up. Section 518 cannot be used to restrain recovery proceedings initiated by a District Collector under the Madras Revenue Recovery Act, because it is confined to attachments, distress or execution issued by a court, and an administrative recovery officer is not a court. The Government&#039;s recovery action therefore remained outside the Companies Act relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>