https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98153 Storage of molasses in kachcha pits within the factory premises, within the context of allotted tank capacity, did not by itself constitute clandestine removal. The absence of prior permission under the Central Excise Rules for such storage was not sufficient to treat the movement or storage as concealed clearance, and procedural non-compliance alone could not sustain a duty demand on that basis. The demand of duty was therefore not sustainable. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:25:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98153 Storage of molasses in kachcha pits within the factory premises, within the context of allotted tank capacity, did not by itself constitute clandestine removal. The absence of prior permission under the Central Excise Rules for such storage was not sufficient to treat the movement or storage as concealed clearance, and procedural non-compliance alone could not sustain a duty demand on that basis. The demand of duty was therefore not sustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98153