<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (2) TMI 49 - IN THE COURT OF APPEAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98144</link>
    <description>A landlord may satisfy section 30(1)(g) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 by showing genuine occupation and intended occupation for its own business or activity, even where another body also uses the premises. Shared occupation does not defeat the claim if the landlord&#039;s own staff and administration support the activity carried on there. A short intended occupation before a non-sale transfer to a successor body can still qualify, provided it is genuine and not an evasion of section 30(2). Section 281 of the Companies Act 1948 does not limit beneficial winding up to financial advantage alone, so it does not bar reliance on section 30(1)(g) in these circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (2) TMI 49 - IN THE COURT OF APPEAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98144</link>
      <description>A landlord may satisfy section 30(1)(g) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 by showing genuine occupation and intended occupation for its own business or activity, even where another body also uses the premises. Shared occupation does not defeat the claim if the landlord&#039;s own staff and administration support the activity carried on there. A short intended occupation before a non-sale transfer to a successor body can still qualify, provided it is genuine and not an evasion of section 30(2). Section 281 of the Companies Act 1948 does not limit beneficial winding up to financial advantage alone, so it does not bar reliance on section 30(1)(g) in these circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>