<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 606 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98120</link>
    <description>The judgment focused on the confiscation of imported goods due to misdeclaration as &quot;Brass Scrap-Honey,&quot; leading to penalties and confiscation orders. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the initial order, allowing for a fresh decision by the Department. The case underscored the necessity for de novo consideration by the lower authority to ensure a fair review process and proper application of legal provisions under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 606 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98120</link>
      <description>The judgment focused on the confiscation of imported goods due to misdeclaration as &quot;Brass Scrap-Honey,&quot; leading to penalties and confiscation orders. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the initial order, allowing for a fresh decision by the Department. The case underscored the necessity for de novo consideration by the lower authority to ensure a fair review process and proper application of legal provisions under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>