https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98111 Rule 137(2) of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 was treated as mandatory, requiring notice of the date fixed for consideration of a liquidator's report to be given on the notice board and to the official liquidator. Persons likely to be affected were entitled to seek a hearing and file affidavits before any order for public examination was made, including the opportunity to challenge the jurisdictional basis for such examination. The court also held that an unperfected interlocutory order could be reconsidered, but recall or review would not be granted merely because the liquidator disagreed with it or faced inconvenience. en-us Mon, 04 May 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:17:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98111 Rule 137(2) of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 was treated as mandatory, requiring notice of the date fixed for consideration of a liquidator's report to be given on the notice board and to the official liquidator. Persons likely to be affected were entitled to seek a hearing and file affidavits before any order for public examination was made, including the opportunity to challenge the jurisdictional basis for such examination. The court also held that an unperfected interlocutory order could be reconsidered, but recall or review would not be granted merely because the liquidator disagreed with it or faced inconvenience. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 04 May 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98111