<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (3) TMI 34 - IN THE COURT OF APPEAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98097</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court&#039;s decision that the action did not qualify for an exception to the rule in Foss v. Harbottle. The court found the claims of damage speculative and unsupported by the facts, and thus, the interests of justice did not require a departure from the established rule. The litigation was characterized as futile, given the company&#039;s state of paralysis due to internal discord.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (3) TMI 34 - IN THE COURT OF APPEAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98097</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court&#039;s decision that the action did not qualify for an exception to the rule in Foss v. Harbottle. The court found the claims of damage speculative and unsupported by the facts, and thus, the interests of justice did not require a departure from the established rule. The litigation was characterized as futile, given the company&#039;s state of paralysis due to internal discord.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>