<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 506 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98094</link>
    <description>Departmental knowledge of the assessee&#039;s assembly and erection activity at customers&#039; premises prevented invocation of the extended limitation period under Section 11A(1); a mere failure to file classification lists or price lists did not amount to suppression, so the demand beyond the normal period was barred. Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was also held applicable to the turbine generating set assembled and erected at site, because the exemption covered capital goods manufactured in a factory and used in the factory of production without adding any requirement that the same manufacturer must use them in his own factory. The exemption remained subject to verification that the generating set exceeded 75 KVA, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 506 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98094</link>
      <description>Departmental knowledge of the assessee&#039;s assembly and erection activity at customers&#039; premises prevented invocation of the extended limitation period under Section 11A(1); a mere failure to file classification lists or price lists did not amount to suppression, so the demand beyond the normal period was barred. Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was also held applicable to the turbine generating set assembled and erected at site, because the exemption covered capital goods manufactured in a factory and used in the factory of production without adding any requirement that the same manufacturer must use them in his own factory. The exemption remained subject to verification that the generating set exceeded 75 KVA, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>