https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98076 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, affirming the timeliness of the copy application under the Companies Act, 1956. The application for a copy of an order confirming an alteration was made within the stipulated time frame as per statutory provisions, considering the exclusion of time required in obtaining copies of court orders when calculating the filing period with the Registrar. The court held that the copy application was filed within the permissible time frame, meeting the statutory requirements for filing the order with the Registrar within the specified period. en-us Fri, 20 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:16:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98076 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, affirming the timeliness of the copy application under the Companies Act, 1956. The application for a copy of an order confirming an alteration was made within the stipulated time frame as per statutory provisions, considering the exclusion of time required in obtaining copies of court orders when calculating the filing period with the Registrar. The court held that the copy application was filed within the permissible time frame, meeting the statutory requirements for filing the order with the Registrar within the specified period. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98076