<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (7) TMI 57 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98059</link>
    <description>A proxy form was held to remain effective despite wrongly describing an extraordinary general meeting as an annual general meeting, because the error was plainly harmless and the form otherwise substantially complied with the required standard form. Proxy votes also could not be rejected wholesale merely because some appointing shareholders had given adverse voting instructions; votes lawfully cast within the proxy&#039;s authority had to be counted. Once those votes were included, the resolutions removing the directors and appointing replacements were validly carried, and later refusal by the new appointees to serve did not alter the legal effect of the meeting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:56:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (7) TMI 57 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98059</link>
      <description>A proxy form was held to remain effective despite wrongly describing an extraordinary general meeting as an annual general meeting, because the error was plainly harmless and the form otherwise substantially complied with the required standard form. Proxy votes also could not be rejected wholesale merely because some appointing shareholders had given adverse voting instructions; votes lawfully cast within the proxy&#039;s authority had to be counted. Once those votes were included, the resolutions removing the directors and appointing replacements were validly carried, and later refusal by the new appointees to serve did not alter the legal effect of the meeting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>