https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98053 In a private examination of a company officer in winding-up, the statutory power to have answers reduced to writing was held wide enough to permit shorthand notes to be transcribed and signed as the deposition. A visible written transcript satisfied the requirement that the evidence be "to writing", and the different wording used for public examinations did not change that construction. The examinee, however, was entitled to read the transcript before signing and to make marginal corrections where errors appeared. The operative effect was that signing could be required, but only after the transcript had been available for review and correction. en-us Mon, 15 Jul 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:37:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98053 In a private examination of a company officer in winding-up, the statutory power to have answers reduced to writing was held wide enough to permit shorthand notes to be transcribed and signed as the deposition. A visible written transcript satisfied the requirement that the evidence be "to writing", and the different wording used for public examinations did not change that construction. The examinee, however, was entitled to read the transcript before signing and to make marginal corrections where errors appeared. The operative effect was that signing could be required, but only after the transcript had been available for review and correction. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 15 Jul 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98053