<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (6) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98050</link>
    <description>A decree against a company after voluntary liquidation remained enforceable against company assets allotted to shareholders, because distribution of those assets did not extinguish liability for the company&#039;s debts. Section 243 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was treated as an enabling provision for restoration proceedings within the prescribed time, not as a complete bar to other lawful remedies. The appellants&#039; suppression of the liquidation and fraudulent conduct prevented them from invoking the statutory protection. On that basis, the decree-holder was entitled to execute the decree against the allotted buses, and the objection based on section 243 failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:33:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (6) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98050</link>
      <description>A decree against a company after voluntary liquidation remained enforceable against company assets allotted to shareholders, because distribution of those assets did not extinguish liability for the company&#039;s debts. Section 243 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was treated as an enabling provision for restoration proceedings within the prescribed time, not as a complete bar to other lawful remedies. The appellants&#039; suppression of the liquidation and fraudulent conduct prevented them from invoking the statutory protection. On that basis, the decree-holder was entitled to execute the decree against the allotted buses, and the objection based on section 243 failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>