<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 405 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98042</link>
    <description>Written submissions received before an adjudication order is issued must be considered where they are already on record, even if received on the next working day after the order was signed. On the facts, the authority&#039;s failure to take account of the appellant&#039;s submissions, despite the matter remaining pending for a long period, amounted to a breach of natural justice. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after hearing the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 405 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98042</link>
      <description>Written submissions received before an adjudication order is issued must be considered where they are already on record, even if received on the next working day after the order was signed. On the facts, the authority&#039;s failure to take account of the appellant&#039;s submissions, despite the matter remaining pending for a long period, amounted to a breach of natural justice. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after hearing the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>