https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98039 Failure to comply with a District Judge's direction to furnish company returns required by the Registrar of Companies, after repeated opportunities to do so, was treated as contempt of court. The affidavit from the Registrar of Companies showed that notice had been issued under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and the opposite party did not file any reply to dispute the allegations. As the record did not support any later compliance, the unchallenged material established disobedience of the court's order within the time allowed, and contempt was found. en-us Fri, 12 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:16:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98039 Failure to comply with a District Judge's direction to furnish company returns required by the Registrar of Companies, after repeated opportunities to do so, was treated as contempt of court. The affidavit from the Registrar of Companies showed that notice had been issued under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and the opposite party did not file any reply to dispute the allegations. As the record did not support any later compliance, the unchallenged material established disobedience of the court's order within the time allowed, and contempt was found. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 12 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98039