<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 384 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal and the order-in-original, remanding the matter for de novo consideration by the Additional Commissioner of Customs. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present additional evidence regarding the purchase of the cars. The Department was instructed not to auction or dispose of the vehicles until the new proceedings were finalized, to be conducted promptly within four months from the order date. The appeals were successful through remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 384 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal and the order-in-original, remanding the matter for de novo consideration by the Additional Commissioner of Customs. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present additional evidence regarding the purchase of the cars. The Department was instructed not to auction or dispose of the vehicles until the new proceedings were finalized, to be conducted promptly within four months from the order date. The appeals were successful through remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>