https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98034 The Tribunal allowed the appeal to proceed without additional pre-deposit due to the value of goods in custody exceeding the case amount. Despite the Department's strong case on duty violations and stock discrepancies, procedural concerns arose regarding goods in custody and lack of proof for the deposited duty. The decision emphasized the importance of proper documentation and compliance with Central Excise Rules for future transactions. en-us Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:40:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98034 The Tribunal allowed the appeal to proceed without additional pre-deposit due to the value of goods in custody exceeding the case amount. Despite the Department's strong case on duty violations and stock discrepancies, procedural concerns arose regarding goods in custody and lack of proof for the deposited duty. The decision emphasized the importance of proper documentation and compliance with Central Excise Rules for future transactions. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98034