<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 499 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98029</link>
    <description>Repeated admissions, supported by surrounding circumstances, were treated as sufficient to establish that the foreign marked gold was of smuggled origin; the belated affidavits and retraction were rejected for lack of credible contemporaneous support, so confiscation of the gold and penalties on the noticees were sustained. The Indian currency, however, was not satisfactorily linked to the sale proceeds of the contraband gold, and the nexus required for confiscation was not proved, so confiscation of the cash was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:26:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 499 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98029</link>
      <description>Repeated admissions, supported by surrounding circumstances, were treated as sufficient to establish that the foreign marked gold was of smuggled origin; the belated affidavits and retraction were rejected for lack of credible contemporaneous support, so confiscation of the gold and penalties on the noticees were sustained. The Indian currency, however, was not satisfactorily linked to the sale proceeds of the contraband gold, and the nexus required for confiscation was not proved, so confiscation of the cash was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>