<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 394 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98024</link>
    <description>Duty on clearance of duty-paid inputs after reversal of Modvat credit is governed by Rule 57F(2) read with the Modvat scheme under Rule 57A, and the appropriate duty is the duty originally paid when the inputs were first removed, not duty computed on the higher resale value. A subsequent sale at an enhanced price does not justify reassessment on that higher value. The impugned demand could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:03:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 394 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98024</link>
      <description>Duty on clearance of duty-paid inputs after reversal of Modvat credit is governed by Rule 57F(2) read with the Modvat scheme under Rule 57A, and the appropriate duty is the duty originally paid when the inputs were first removed, not duty computed on the higher resale value. A subsequent sale at an enhanced price does not justify reassessment on that higher value. The impugned demand could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>