<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 359 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98013</link>
    <description>The appeals were accepted, and the orders of the Collector were set aside. The goods were classified under Heading 40.02, and the penalties and demands were annulled. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the expert opinions, previous test reports, and the binding precedent set by the Calcutta High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:44:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 359 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98013</link>
      <description>The appeals were accepted, and the orders of the Collector were set aside. The goods were classified under Heading 40.02, and the penalties and demands were annulled. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the expert opinions, previous test reports, and the binding precedent set by the Calcutta High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>