<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (5) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98010</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the reissue of forfeited shares does not amount to an allotment under section 75(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, no return is necessary for reissued forfeited shares. Additionally, the court clarified that sub-section (5) of section 75 does not change the traditional interpretation of &quot;allotment&quot; in section 75(1). The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (5) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98010</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the reissue of forfeited shares does not amount to an allotment under section 75(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, no return is necessary for reissued forfeited shares. Additionally, the court clarified that sub-section (5) of section 75 does not change the traditional interpretation of &quot;allotment&quot; in section 75(1). The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>