<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98001</link>
    <description>Directors owe fiduciary duties and may incur misfeasance liability where they knowingly, or where circumstances require them to know, that a transaction substitutes recoverable company claims with practically worthless security. Sanctioning an arrangement that transfers liabilities to an asset-holding company despite its weak financial position and prior encumbrances can constitute deliberate misapplication of company assets causing loss. Liability may differ according to each director&#039;s role, benefit obtained and relevant circumstances: directors principally responsible may bear full liability, while discretionary relief can reduce liability for a director who participated but did not personally profit. Other respondents may be exonerated where responsibility is not established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:33:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98001</link>
      <description>Directors owe fiduciary duties and may incur misfeasance liability where they knowingly, or where circumstances require them to know, that a transaction substitutes recoverable company claims with practically worthless security. Sanctioning an arrangement that transfers liabilities to an asset-holding company despite its weak financial position and prior encumbrances can constitute deliberate misapplication of company assets causing loss. Liability may differ according to each director&#039;s role, benefit obtained and relevant circumstances: directors principally responsible may bear full liability, while discretionary relief can reduce liability for a director who participated but did not personally profit. Other respondents may be exonerated where responsibility is not established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>