<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (1) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF ALLHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97993</link>
    <description>A declaration of solvency for voluntary winding-up must comply strictly with section 488(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 and rule 313 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959: it must be supported by an audit report up to the latest practicable date, a balance-sheet as on that date, and a separate statement of assets and liabilities in the prescribed form. A declaration supported only by earlier accounts, lacking the required statement, and not filed in Form 149 does not satisfy the statutory precondition. Such defects are substantive, not merely formal, so the voluntary winding-up is not validly initiated and the resolutions appointing the liquidator and supervisors are void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (1) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF ALLHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97993</link>
      <description>A declaration of solvency for voluntary winding-up must comply strictly with section 488(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 and rule 313 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959: it must be supported by an audit report up to the latest practicable date, a balance-sheet as on that date, and a separate statement of assets and liabilities in the prescribed form. A declaration supported only by earlier accounts, lacking the required statement, and not filed in Form 149 does not satisfy the statutory precondition. Such defects are substantive, not merely formal, so the voluntary winding-up is not validly initiated and the resolutions appointing the liquidator and supervisors are void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>